Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
El-Hanania v Cull [2024] FCA 814 File number: NSD 969 of 2024
Judgment of: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 24 July 2024
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – where applicant (an undischarged bankrupt) seeks trustees' consent to travel overseas – where trustees refused consent – whether Court should direct trustees to give consent
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 77(1), 272(1)(c); Sch 2, s 90͏͏͏͏͏–15
Cases cited: Booth v Offerman as the Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Geoffrey David Booth [2019] FCA 5 Macchia v Nilant (2001) 110 FCR 101 Nasr v Dixon (Trustee), in the matter of Nasr (Bankrupt) [2018] FCA 1039 Re Hicks; Ex parte Lamb (1994) 217 ALR 195 Stillman v Pascoe [2010] FMCA 549 Tinkler v Melluish [2017] FCA 52 Re Tyndall: Ex parte Official Receiver (1977) 17 ALR 182
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 44
Date of hearing: 23 July 2024
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant was self-represented
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr Cull appeared for himself and the Second Respondent
ORDERS NSD 969 of 2024
BETWEEN: SABA EL HANANIA Applicant
AND: INNIS CULL First Respondent
ANDREW YEO Second Respondent
order made by: KATZMANN J DATE OF ORDER: 24 JULY 2024
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate