Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Patterson v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 2) [2024] FCA 818 File number: VID 1062 of 2023
Judgment of: RAPER J
Date of judgment: 25 July 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by the first respondent for the documents on the Court file to be ordered confidential – where the respondents have not filed their pleadings and have brought a strike out application – where the parties have settled the proceedings – whether such orders are necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice – application allowed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AE, 37AG(1), 37AF Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.32, 2.32(1)(b),
Cases cited: Lee v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2023] FCAFC 22; 296 FCR 272 Liverpool City Council v McGraw-Hill Financial, Inc (now known as S&P Global Inc) [2018] FCA 1289 McLaughlin v Glenn [2020] FCA 679 Oldham v Capgemini Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 1101 Patterson v Westpac Banking Corporation [2024] FCA 629 Porter v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2021] FCA 863 R v Legal Aid Board; ex parte Kaim Todner (a firm) [1999] QB 966 Reynolds v JP Morgan Administrative Services Australia Limited (No 2) [2011] FCA 489; 193 FCR 507 Valentine v Freemantlemedia Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1293
Division: Fair Work Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate