Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Icon Co (NSW) Pty Ltd v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Australian Branch trading as Liberty Specialty Markets [2024] FCA 840 File number: VID 954 of 2023
Judgment of: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 1 August 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for permanent stay or strike out of a particular claim – where the applicants (the insureds) claimed that the first respondent (the insurer) had breached its duty of utmost good faith – where the insurer contended that the claim should be permanently stayed or struck out on the basis of Anshun estoppel and/or abuse of process principles – whether it was unreasonable not to have brought the claim in an earlier proceeding – held: application for permanent stay or strike out of claim dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 37M, 37N Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth), ss 13, 58 Federal Court Rules 2011, rr 16.02, 16.21
Cases cited: Champerslife Pty Ltd v Manojlovski [2010] NSWCA 33; 75 NSWLR 245 Forrest v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2012] HCA 39; 247 CLR 486 Gibbs v Kinna [1999] 2 VR 19 Hungerfords v Walker [1989] HCA 8; 171 CLR 125 O'Brien v Tanning Research Laboratories (1988) 14 NSWLR 601 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45; 147 CLR 589 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 28; 256 CLR 507 UBS AG v Tyne [2018] HCA 45; 265 CLR 77 Williams v Spautz [1992] HCA 34; 174 CLR 509
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate