Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Maroon v Aquamore Credit Equity Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 846 File number: NSD 118 of 2024
Judgment of: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 24 July 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE –want of prosecution – where show cause order made – where appellant failed to comply with directions or orders of the Court – where appellant failed to appear – s 37M of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – efficient use of judicial resources – procedural fairness in granting adjournment – prejudice entering from s 41(3)(c)(i) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) if appeal hearing adjourned to next sittings – balance between appellant's right of appeal and respondent's interest in finality
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 41 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.52
Cases cited: Aquamore Credit Equity Pty Ltd v Maroon (No 2) [2024] FCA 14 Aquamore Credit Equity Pty Ltd v Maroon [2023] FCA 1399 Nandutu v Chapman (No 2) [2021] FCA 45 Wade v AMI Australia Holdings Pty Ltd (2010) 274 ALR 431
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 20
Date of hearing: 24 July 2024
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant did not appear
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr B Koch
Solicitor for the Respondent: Independent Legal
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate