Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Light & Wonder, Inc v Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited [2024] FCA 870 Appeal from: Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Light & Wonder, Inc. [2024] FCA 439
File number: NSD 623 of 2024
Judgment of: JACKMAN J
Date of judgment: 7 August 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – preliminary discovery – application for leave to appeal – where prospective proceedings concern misuse of confidential information and copyright infringement – where related proceedings commenced by prospective applicant in the United States – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 7.23
Cases cited: Alphapharm Pty Ltd v Eli Lilly Australia Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 391 Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Ainsworth Game Technology Ltd [2018] FCA 1511 Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 844; (1991) 33 FCR 397 Echo Tasmania Pty Ltd v Imperial Chemical Industries plc [2008] FCAFC 58 Hooper v Kirella Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1584; (1999) 96 FCR 1 Objectivision Pty Ltd v Visionsearch Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1087; (2014) 108 IPR 244 Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 133; (2008) 169 FCR 435 Quanta Software International Pty Ltd v Computer Management Services Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 969; (2000) 49 IPR 25 St George Bank Ltd v Rabo Australia Ltd [2004] FCA 1360; (2004) 211 ALR 147
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate