Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pascoe v Voukidis Holdings Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 915 File number(s): VID 105 of 2023
Judgment of: BUTTON J
Date of judgment: 16 August 2024
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – transactions void against trustee – where first respondent proved in bankruptcy pursuant to loan agreement between it and the bankrupts dated 1 October 2010 (Loan Agreement) – where third respondent, a director of first respondent, and son of bankrupts, had chequered history of fabricating documents and giving false evidence – whether Loan Agreement backdated – whether Loan Agreement created security interest over bankrupts' home – whether first respondent entered into Loan Agreement as trustee of a trust or in its own capacity – amount for which first respondent should be admitted as creditor EQUITY – whether Loan Agreement created equitable mortgage or equitable charge – where first respondent's obligation to provide funds under Loan Agreement conditional upon having received a mortgage in registrable form "on terms acceptable to the Lender" – where bankrupts and borrowers under Loan Agreement required to use "best endeavours" to obtain a mortgage in registerable form EQUITY – unconscionable conduct – undue influence – whether relationship gives rise to presumption of undue influence outside established categories – whether Loan Agreement should be set aside – conditions on which Loan Agreement should be set aside – where bankrupts and borrowers under Loan Agreement elderly, retired and depended on son for income – where Loan Agreement imposed onerous terms, including a default interest rate of 24%, compounding monthly BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – ss 120 and 121 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – s 37A of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) – onus of proof – where bankrupts disposed of shares in first respondent within five years of beginning of bankruptcy – where shares later transferred to third respondent – whether share transfers void against trustee – whether trustee discharged onus of proving inadequacy of consideration
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate