Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Patel v Agrawal, in the matter of Sankul Investments Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 997 File number: NSD 1112 of 2024
Judgment of: YATES J
Date of judgment: 16 August 2024
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – alleged threatened oppressive conduct – whether interlocutory relief should be granted to restrain the holding of a general meeting to remove a director where the director has no entitlement to be appointed – whether serious question raised for the granting of interlocutory relief – whether the balance of convenience favours the grant of such relief
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 203C, 232, 233 and 249C
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 19
Date of hearing: 16 August 2024
Counsel for the Plaintiffs: Mr S Wells
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: A Plus Legal
Solicitor for the First and Second Defendants: Mr S Gubta of Gupta & Co Pty Ltd
Solicitor for the Third Defendant: Mr S Saadat of Invictus Legal
Counsel for the Fourth Defendant: No appearances
ORDERS NSD 1112 of 2024
IN THE MATTER OF SANKUL INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 615 176 326) BETWEEN: SNEHALKUMAR KIRTIBHAI PATEL First Plaintiff
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate