Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Darranda Pty Ltd (Liability) [2024] FCA 1015 File number(s): VID 181 of 2022
Judgment of: HESPE J
Date of judgment: 4 September 2024
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – consumer credit – whether customer contracts are consumer leases or credit contracts for the purposes of the National Credit Code (Sch 1 to the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth)) – whether Australian Credit Licence holder failed to do all things necessary to ensure that its licensed credit activities were engaged in efficiently, honestly and fairly – whether master franchisor "involved in" contraventions
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 140 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 21 National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth) ss 3, 5, 47, 166, 169, Sch 1 (National Credit Code) ss 3, 4, 5, 9, 11, 14, 17, 23, 24, 32A, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 174A
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v ActiveSuper Pty Ltd (in liq) [2015] FCA 342; (2015) 235 FCR 181 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v AGM Markets Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2020] FCA 208; (2020) 275 FCR 57 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v AMP Financial Planning Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 69 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Camelot Derivatives Pty Ltd (in liq) [2012] FCA 414 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2022] FCA 1422 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Ferratum Australia Pty Limited (in liq) [2023] FCA 1043 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift [2021] FCA 1384 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Membo Finance Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] FCA 126 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v National Australia Bank Ltd [2022] FCA 1324 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rent 2 Own Cars Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1312 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation (Omnibus) [2022] FCA 515 Cochrane v Moore (1890) 25 QBD 57 Commissioner of State Revenue v Politis [2004] VSC 126 Commissioner of Taxation v Carter [2022] HCA 10; (2022) 274 CLR 304 Commissioner of Taxation v Sara Lee Household & Body Care (Australia) Pty Ltd [2000] HCA 35; (2000) 201 CLR 520 Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 1; (2022) 275 CLR 165 Earl of Egmont v Smith (1877) 6 Ch D 469 Emwest Products Pty Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union [2002] FCA 61; (2002) 117 FCR 588 Flinn v White [1950] SASR 195 Hamilton v Whitehead [1988] HCA 65; (1988) 166 CLR 121 Hill v Wilson (1873) LR 8 Ch App 888 Irons v Smallpiece (1819) 106 ER 467 Make It Mine Finance Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 393; (2015) 238 FCR 562 Maxwell v Maxwell [2022] NSWSC 1028 Nolan v Nolan [2003] VSC 121; (2003) 10 VR 626 Productivity Partners Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2024] HCA 27 Rowland v Stevenson [2005] NSWSC 325 Rural Press Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] HCA 75; (2003) 216 CLR 53 Scammell v Ouston [1941] AC 251 Scott v Bridge [2020] EWHC 3116 (Ch) Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass [1972] AC 153 Yorke v Lucas [1985] HCA 65; (1985) 158 CLR 661
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate