Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Lazarus v Attorney-General (Cth) [2024] FCA 1021 File number: NSD 652 of 2024
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 6 September 2024
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for judicial review of parole decision – whether Delegate failed to given proper, genuine and realistic consideration to relevant matters – whether decision gave rise to jurisdictional error – whether decision was an improper exercise of power – whether the decision was illogical, irrational or legally unreasonable – Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 19AKA, 19AL(1), 19ALA – application dismissed
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Part IB, Division 5, ss 16BA, 19AKA, 19AL, 19ALA Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) ss 474.19(1)(a)(i),(ii), 474.22A(1), 474.26(1), 474.27A(1)
Cases cited: Alexander v Attorney-General (Cth) [2019] FCA 1829 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; (2017) 252 FCR 352 DYS21 v Attorney-General (Cth) [2021] FCA 1331; (2021) 288 FCR 607 Eden v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 28; (2016) 240 FCR 158 Khawaja v Attorney-General (Cth) [2022] FCA 334; (2022) 293 FCR 396 Khazaal v Attorney-General [2020] FCA 448 Lazarus v R [2023] NSWCCA 214 Lodhi v Attorney-General (Cth) [2020] FCA 1383 Masri v Attorney-General (Cth) [2022] FCA 17; (2022) 398 ALR 509 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; (2016) 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs v McQueen [2024] HCA 11; (2024) 98 ALJR 594 Minogue v Victoria [2019] HCA 31; (2019) 93 ALJR 1031 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17; (2022) 275 CLR 582 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Palme [2003] HCA 56; (2003) 216 CLR 212 Roberts v Attorney General [2022] FCA 574; (2022) 176 ALD 509 Salgado v Attorney-General (Cth) [2023] FCA 984 Stambe v Minister for Health [2019] FCA 43; (2019) 270 FCR 173 Stephens v Attorney-General [2021] FCA 204
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate