Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ogbonna v CTI Logistics Ltd (No 4) [2024] FCA 1035 Appeal from: CTI Logistics v Ogbonna [2022] FedCFamC2G 781
File number: WAD 218 of 2022
Judgment of: FEUTRILL J
Date of judgment: 5 September 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to file proposed interlocutory application – proposed applicant subject of vexatious proceedings order - refusal to accept document that is abuse of process or is frivolous or vexatious
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 35A(5), 37AO(2), 37AR(2) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 3.01, 3.04, 3.11, 36.11, 36.52, 39.05(c); Pt 42; Divs 36.5; Sch 2
Cases cited: Brimaud v Honeysett Instant Print Pty Ltd (1988) 217 ALR 44 Luo v Zhai (No 6) [2016] FCA 805 Ogbonna, in the matter of Ogbonna [2023] FCA 1334 Ogbonna v CTI Logistics Ltd (No 2) [2024] FCA 383 Ogbonna v CTI Logistics Ltd (No 3) [2024] FCA 872
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 16
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant did not appear
Counsel for the Respondents: The Respondents did not appear
Solicitor for the Respondents: Jackson McDonald
ORDERS WAD 218 of 2022
BETWEEN: CELESTINE OGBONNA Appellant
AND: CTI LOGISTICS LTD (ACN 008 778 925) First Respondent
MARK VANDERLIST Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate