Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Greenwich v Latham [2024] FCA 1050 File number(s): NSD 475 of 2023
Judgment of: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 11 September 2024
Catchwords: DEFAMATION – proceeding against a member of New South Wales Parliament brought by another member – imputations pleaded in respect of two impugned publications – consideration of whether imputations conveyed – first imputation made in "primary tweet" held to be conveyed – whether imputation defamatory – consideration of whether publication of defamatory matter about the applicant has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to his reputation within the meaning of s 10A(1) of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) – serious harm found – defences of honest opinion pursuant to s 31 of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) and common law qualified privilege (reply to attack) – where defences not made out – where applicant sought general damages for non-economic loss – where applicant sought aggravated damages – assessment of damages – where alleged unjustifiable conduct said to support award of aggravated damages – quantification of damages
Legislation: Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) ss 10A, 10A(1), 31, 31(1) Defamation Act 2013 (UK) s 1
Cases cited: Amersi v Leslie [2023] EWHC 1368 (KB) Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Chau Chak Wing (2019) 271 FCR 632 Banks v Cadwalladr [2023] 3 WLR 167 Barilaro v Google LLC [2022] FCA 650 Barron v Vines [2016] EWHC 1226 (QB) Bashford v Information Australia (Newsletters) Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 366 Bazzi v Dutton (2022) 289 FCR 1 Berkoff v Burchill [1996] 4 All ER 1008 Burton v Crowell Pub Co 82 F (2d) 154 (1936) Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 44 Chappell v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (1988) 14 NSWLR 153 Economou v De Freitas [2017] EMLR 4; [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) Ettingshausen v Australian Consolidated Press Ltd (1991) NSWLR 443 Gould v Jordan (No 2) [2021] FCA 1289 Hanson v Burston [2023] FCAFC 124 Harbour Radio Pty Ltd v Trad (2012) 247 CLR 31 KSMC Holdings Pty Ltd t/a Hubba Bubba Childcare on Haig v Bowden (2020) 101 NSWLR 729 Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2020] AC 612 Lee v Wilson (1934) 51 CLR 276 Loveday v Sun Newspapers Ltd (1938) 59 CLR 503 Mirror Newspapers Ltd v World Hosts Pty Ltd (1979) 141 CLR 632 Monroe v Hopkins [2017] 4 WLR 68; [2017] EWHC 433 (QB) Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Rush [2020] FCAFC 115; (2020) 380 ALR 432 Newman v Whittington [2022] NSWSC 249 Parmiter v Coupland (1840) 151 ER 340 Penton v Calwell (1945) 70 CLR 219 Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton (2009) 238 CLR 460 Riley v Sivier [2023] EMLR 6; [2022] EWHC 2891 (KB) Selkirk v Hocking (No 2) [2023] FCA 1085 Selkirk v Wyatt (2024) 302 FCR 541 Sivananthan v Vasikaran [2023] EMLR 7; [2022] EWHC 2938 (KB) Stead v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 15; (2021) 387 ALR 123 Stocker v Stocker [2020] AC 593 Sutcliffe v Pressdram Ltd [1991] 1 QB 153 Triggell v Pheeney (1951) 82 CLR 497 Trkulja v Google LLC (2018) 263 CLR 149 Wilson v Mendelsohn [2024] EWHC 821 (KB) Zbyszko v New York American Inc (1930) 228 App Div 277 Neuberger J, Antisemitism: what it is. what it isn't. why it matters (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2019)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate