Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Djunaedi v Mohor, in the matter of Mohor [2024] FCA 1073 File number(s):
Judgment of: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 16 September 2024
Catchwords: COSTS – whether lump sum costs order should be made – whether evidence meets requisite level of detail – requirement that costs determination be fair, logical, and reasonable – lump sum costs order appropriate – assessment of quantum referred to Registrar of Court as referee – s 54A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M, 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 26.12(7), div 28.6
Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 146; (2017) 253 FCR 403 Rickus v Motor Trades Association of Australia Superannuation Fund Pty Limited [2010] FCAFC 16 Jenkins Sh v Australia Council for the Arts [2024] FCA 309 Cases cited: Kadam v MiiResorts Group 1 Pty Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 1139 Hislop v Paltar Petroleum Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 1632 Linke v TT Builders Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 672 Collins v Djunaedi (No 2) [2024] SASCA 2 Bespoke Recycling Industries Pty Ltd v Recycling Developments Pty Ltd [2022] QSC 118
Division: General Division
Registry: South Australia
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area:
Number of paragraphs: 30
Date of last submission/s: 21 March 2024
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Solicitor for Applicants: Websters Lawyers
Solicitor for Respondent: Diaspora Legal
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate