Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Bainbridge v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 1080 Review of: Bainbridge and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] AATA 4184
File number(s): WAD 337 of 2023
Judgment of: MCDONALD J
Date of judgment: 18 September 2024
MIGRATION – application for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – non-revocation of visa cancellation – failure to satisfy character test – Tribunal bound by Ministerial Direction 99 issued under s 499 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) to consider best interests of minor child affected by decision – identification of minor children affected by decision – whether Tribunal erred by failing to determine whether revocation of visa cancellation was in best interests of applicant's niece and nephew – whether error material Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – non-revocation of visa cancellation – failure to satisfy character test – where applicant self-represented – where applicant questioned about potential breaches of law during cross-examination – whether Tribunal should have informed applicant of privilege against self-incrimination – whether Tribunal failed to afford applicant procedural fairness – whether error material
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 39, 62 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 234, 499, 500, 501, 501CA
AJN23 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCAFC 103 Downes v Minister for Home Affairs (2020) 168 ALD 498; [2020] FCA 54 Griffin v Sogelease Australia Ltd (2003) 57 NSWLR 257; [2003] NSWCA 158 Hamilton v Oades (1989) 166 CLR 486 Ismail v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (2024) 98 ALJR 196; [2024] HCA 2 KXXH v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2022) 292 FCR 15; [2022] FCAFC 111 LPDT v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2024) 98 ALJR 610; [2024] HCA 12 Lucas v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1653 Cases cited: MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2021) 273 CLR 506; [2021] HCA 17 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 276 CLR 80; [2022] HCA 26 Promsopa v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1480 Reid v Howard (1995) 184 CLR 1 RZMW v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 168 ALD 176; [2019] FCA 1761 SZHWY v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 159 FCR 1; [2007] FCAFC 64 TPTN v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCAFC 82 Uelese v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 256 CLR 203; [2015] HCA 15 Verrill v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 802 X7 v Australian Crime Commission (2013) 248 CLR 92; [2013] HCA 29
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate