Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Fisher v Isuzu Motors Ltd [2024] FCA 1109 File number(s): NSD 1109 of 2024
Judgment of: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 19 September 2024
Date of publication of reasons: 25 September 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – service of originating application and statement of claim on respondent based in Japan – whether service of the documents "not practicable" – deemed service ordered pursuant to rules 10.23 and 10.48 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) sch 2 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 10.23, 10.24, 10.43C, 10.44, 10.48, 10.64
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v China Environment Group Ltd [2013] FCA 286 bCode Proprietary Limited (in liq) v Holford [2018] FCA 798 Sanum Investments Limited v ST Group Co., Ltd (No. 2) [2019] FCA 1047 Mercator Property Consultants Pty Ltd v Christmas Island Resort Pty Ltd (Nicholson J, 14 July 1998, unreported)
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 15
Date of hearing: 19 September 2024
Counsel for applicants: Q Rares with Mr S Thomson
Solicitor for applicants: Piper Alderman
ORDERS NSD 1109 of 2024
BETWEEN: GEOFFREY FISHER First Applicant
CDR GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PTY LTD (ACN 168 381 584) Second Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate