Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Copeland (liquidator) v Odeesh, in the matter of FBF Transport Pty Ltd (in liq) [2024] FCA 1136 File number: NSD 1347 of 2024
Judgment of: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 26 September 2024
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application for issue of warrant under s 530C of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – ex parte application – leave to have warrant issued – evidence defendant has not cooperated in refraining from making use of or delivering up property of the company in liquidation to the plaintiff liquidator PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – suppression orders – whether necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 530C Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 37AF Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 2.32(1)(b), (3)(a), 14.11(1)(a)
Cases cited: Carello (liquidator), in the matter of Drilling Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) [2019] FCA 1563; 139 ACSR 187 Tang (liquidator) v Wright, in the matter of Wright's Transport Pty Ltd (in liq) [2020] FCA 709
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 11
Date of hearing: 26 September 2024
Counsel for the Plaintiffs: J Parrish
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: Hilton Bradley Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 1347 of 2024 IN THE MATTER OF FBF TRANSPORT PTY LTD (IN LIQ) BETWEEN: BRENDAN COPELAND IN HIS CAPACITY AS LIQUIDATOR OF FBF TRANSPORT PTY LTD (IN LIQ) First Plaintiff
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate