Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Petrovsky v Southern Adelaide Local Health Network Incorporated (No 2) [2024] FCA 1141 File number(s): VID 359 of 2024
Judgment of: SNADEN J
Date of judgment: 1 October 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal interlocutory judgment dismissing application for interim injunctive relief – whether primary judgment attended with sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration – on the assumption that primary judge erred, whether substantial injustice would result if leave to appeal was refused – application dismissed.
Cases cited: Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Dimitrovski v Boland [2023] FCAFC 86 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Petrovsky v Southern Adelaide Local Health Network Inc [2024] FCA 396 Petrovsky v Southern Adelaide Local Health Network Incorporated [2024] FCA 500 Samsung Electronics Company Ltd v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 31
Date of hearing: 23 September 2024
Solicitor for the Applicants: Mr J Vidanage of Old Port Chambers
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr B Garnaut
Solicitor for the First Respondent: MinterEllison
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr T Duggan KC with Mr S Wilson
Solicitor for the Second Applicant: Dentons Australia Ltd
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate