Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Luck v Secretary, Services Australia [2024] FCA 1158 File number(s): VID 411 of 2024
Judgment of: DOWLING J
Date of judgment: 3 October 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – review sought under Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) and Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – whether adequate provision is made for other review under the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 (Cth) – whether the Court should exercise its discretion to dismiss proceedings – proceedings dismissed
Administrative Appeals Act 1975 (Cth) s 43 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5, 6, 7, 10, 16 Age Discrimination Act 2004 (Cth) Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) Legislation: Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 (Cth) ss 63, 129, 135, 142, 179 Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) s 23 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 30.01
Ambrose v Commonwealth of Australia [2020] FCA 1439 Aquila Steel Pty Ltd v BHP Minerals Pty Ltd [2022] WASC 121 Cremona v Administration Appeals Tribunal [2015] FCAFC 72; 230 FCR 1 Dalian Steelforce Hi-Tech Co Ltd v Minister for Home Affairs [2012] FCA 1192; 243 FCR 176 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Futuris Corporation Ltd [2008] HCA 32; 237 CLR 146 Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd [1972] HCA 61; 127 CLR 421 Griffith University v Tang [2005] HCA 7; 221 CLR 99 Cases cited: Haque v Secretary Department of Social Services (Centrelink) [2024] FCA 295 Kamha v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority [2005] FCAFC 248; 147 FCR 516 McLeish v Faure [1979] FCA 38; 25 ALR 403 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39; 83 ALJR 1123 Murphy v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2022] FCA 1605; 180 ALD 347 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] HCA 2; 211 CLR 476 Reading Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Mutual Provident Society [1999] FCA 718; 240 FCR 276 Swan Portland Cement Ltd v The Comptroller-General of Customs (1989) 25 FCR 523 University of Sydney v Resmed Ltd (No 5) [2012] FCA 232
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate