Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Nona on behalf of the Badulgal, Mualgal and Kaurareg Peoples (Warral & Ului) v State of Queensland (No 6) [2024] FCA 1162 File number:
Judgment of: MORTIMER CJ
Date of judgment: 4 October 2024
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – determination by consent after contested separate questions hearing – requirements of s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) satisfied – appropriate to make orders – nomination of prescribed body corporate
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 56, 66, 67, 68, 87, 87A, 223, 225
Akiba on behalf of the Torres Strait Islanders of the Regional Seas Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 3) [2010] FCA 643; 204 FCR 1 Drury on behalf of the Nanda People v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 1849 Nona on behalf of the Badu People (Warral & Ului) v State of Queensland [2020] FCA 983 Cases cited: Nona on behalf of the Badulgal, Mualgal and Kaurareg Peoples (Warral & Ului) v State of Queensland (No 5) [2023] FCA 135 Nona and Manas v State of Queensland [2006] FCA 412 Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 24) (Olkola determination) [2024] FCA 740 Taylor on behalf of the Yamatji Nation Claim v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 42
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate