Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Rainbow, in the matter of Rainbow [2024] FCA 1197 File number:
Judgment of: FEUTRILL J
Date of judgment: 24 September 2024
Date of publication of reasons: 15 October 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interim injunction restraining operation of administrative decision before start of proceeding – suspension of operation of decision under s 15(1) of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) – serious question to be tried – balance of convenience
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 3(1), 5, 5(1), 11, 15(1), 16 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Legislation: Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1) Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) ss 84(3A)(b), 90, 90(1B); Pt 5 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 7.01
Cases cited: Adachi Disability Services Pty Ltd v Commissioner of the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission [2024] FCA 311
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area:
Number of paragraphs: 20
Date of hearing: 24 September 2024
Counsel for the Prospective Applicant: Mr A Dique
Solicitor for the Prospective Applicant: Bailiwick Legal
ORDERS WAD 269 of 2024 IN THE MATTER OF ANGELA MARGARET RAINBOW ANGELA MARGARET RAINBOW Prospective Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate