Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Bullen v Mangano [2024] FCA 1199 File number(s):
Judgment of: GOODMAN J
Date of judgment: 17 October 2024
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – creditor's petition for a sequestration order – respondent debtor's evidence inadequate to establish that she is able to pay her debts within the meaning of s 52(2)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – sequestration order made
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 37, 40, 43, 52
Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 63 Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd v D-Link Homes Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1279 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Begonia (1993) 11 ACLC 1075 Culleton v Balwyn Nominees Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 8; (2017) 343 ALR 632 Day, in the matter of Gould v Gould [2000] FCA 1377 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Bayconnection Property Developments Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 363; (2012) 127 ALD 64 Cases cited: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v De Simone Consulting Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 548 Endresz v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2014] FCA 1139 Francis v Eggleston Mitchell Lawyers Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 18 Mehajer v Weston (Trustee), in the matter of Mehajer [2018] FCA 608 Re Sarina v Council of the Shire of Wollondilly [1980] FCA 175; (1980) 48 FLR 372 Ritson v Commissioner of Police (NSW) [2021] FCAFC 208 Shaw v Yarranova Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 88; (2017) 252 FCR 167 Xu v Megaward Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 232; (2018) 130 ACSR 412
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate