Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Ripani v Century Legend Pty Ltd (No 4) [2024] FCA 1211 File number(s): VID 266 of 2020 VID 358 of 2023
Judgment of: NESKOVCIN J
Date of judgment: 18 October 2024
CONSUMER LAW – misleading and deceptive conduct – contract of sale of apartment sold "off the plan" – reliance – whether Applicants continued to rely on representations that were misleading and deceptive – reliance established Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – remedies – what orders the Court should make under ss 237 and 243 of the Australian Consumer Law – orders for the recission of the contract of sale and return of a bank guarantee CONTRACTS – breach of contract of sale – variation – whether the contract of sale was varied – whether vendor failed to construct the apartment substantially in accordance with the contract of sale – whether purchasers entitled to rescind under the rule in Flight v Booth – repudiation – whether vendor repudiated the contract of sale – whether vendor was ready, willing and able to perform the contract of sale – estoppel – whether vendor should be estopped – whether purchasers were obliged to settle the purchase under the contract of sale – purchasers entitled to rescind DAMAGES – entitlement to forfeit of the deposit – loss and damage – deficiency in the resale price – expenses on the resale of the apartment – holding costs – borrowing costs – contractual interest – legal costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate