Federal Court of Australia
AAI20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2024] FCA 1223 Appeal from:
File number:
Judgment of: FEUTRILL J
Date of judgment: 22 October 2024
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from decision of Federal Circuit Court and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) dismissing application for judicial review of the decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority affirming delegate's decision to refuse appellant's application for protection visa - error in formation of state of satisfaction in exercise of procedural power under s 473DD of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – meaning of credible personal information – new information capable of being believed – misconstruction or misunderstanding of statute – legally unreasonable conclusion or process of reasoning – materiality – could absence of error have made a realistic difference to exercise of substantive review power
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5(1), 5AA, 29, 35A, 35A(3B), 36, 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 36(2)(b), 36(2)(c), 51A, 54-64, 65, 66(1), 473BA, 473BB, 473CA, 473CB, 473CB(1)(b), 473CB(1)(c), 473CC, 473DA, 473DA(1), 473DB, 473DB(2), 473DC, 473DD, 473DD(a), 473DD(b), 473DD(b)(i), 473DD(b)(ii), 473DE, 473E(1), 473FA(2), 473FB, 496; Ptt 2, 7AA; Div 3, subdiv AB Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Sch 2
AAI20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 707 Abebe v Commonwealth [1999] HCA 14; 197 CLR 510 ABH18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 620 ABT17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] HCA 34; 269 CLR 439 AUS17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] HCA 37; 269 CLR 494 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; 170 CLR 321 AZT22 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 90 BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 34; 268 CLR 29 BDY18 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCAFC 24; 273 FCR 170 CDJ19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 345 CSR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 474 DAO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 2; 258 FCR 175 DLB17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCAFC 230 DPT17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 15 Cases cited: DVO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 12; 273 CLR 177 EAC16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1657 EHF17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1681; 272 FCR 409 LPDT v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2024] HCA 12 Minister for Home Affairs v DUA16 [2020] HCA 46; 271 CLR 550 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v BTW17 [2020] FCAFC 159; 294 FCR 150 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21; 197 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32; 207 ALR 12 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16; 264 CLR 217 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30; 198 ALR 59 Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney [2012] FCAFC 146; 207 FCR 277
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate