Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Capital Territory v Ross [2024] FCA 1229 Appeal from: Re Ross and Australian Capital Territory (Compensation) [2023] AATA 3569
File number(s): ACD 69 of 2023
Judgment of: NEEDHAM J
Date of judgment: 23 October 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal from decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – appeal allowed by consent
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 20(5)(b), 25(2B)(b) Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) s 4(9)(b)
Cases cited: Bradken Limited v Norcast S.ár.L (2013) 219 FCR 101; [2013] FCAFC 123 CQX18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 142 PYDZ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 14 Redbubble Ltd v Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 1467 Re Ross and Australian Capital Territory (Compensation) [2023] AATA 3569
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: Australian Capital Territory
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 9
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Sydney
Solicitor for the Applicant: Sparke Helmore Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent was self-represented
ORDERS ACD 69 of 2023
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY Applicant
AND: GERARD ROSS Respondent
order made by: NEEDHAM J DATE OF ORDER: 23 OCTOBER 2024
BY CONSENT, THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate