Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Trimuryani v Retail Food Group Limited [2024] FCA 1282 File number(s): VID 598 of 2021
Judgment of: ANDERSON J
Date of judgment: 31 October 2024
Date of publication of reasons 7 November 2024
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – Application for approval of settlement of a representative proceeding – principles relevant to approval of settlement – where settlement involved mutual releases – where settlement involved some group members receiving a greater benefit than other group members – determined that settlement was fair and reasonable in the interests of the group members as a whole – settlement approved
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Equity Financial Planners Pty Ltd v Equity Financial Planning Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1036 Findlay v DSHE Holdings Ltd (2021) 150 ACSR 535; NSWSC 249 Fowkes v Boston Scientific Corporation [2023] FCA 230
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 45
Date of hearing: 31 October 2024
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms C van Proctor
Solicitor for the Applicant: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr G Kozminsky
Solicitor for the Respondents: Arnold Bloch Leibler
ORDERS VID 598 of 2021
BETWEEN: DEVI TRIMURYANI Applicant
AND: RETAIL FOOD GROUP LIMITED (ACN 106 940 082) First Respondent
MICHEL'S PATISSERIE SYSTEM PTY LTD (ACN 132 424 947) Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate