Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Qajar v Australian Human Rights Commission [2024] FCA 1292 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Qajar v Australian Human Rights Commission [2023] FCA 314
File number(s): QUD 148 of 2023
Judgment of: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 8 November 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal – where primary judgment dismissed application for leave to issue subpoenas – leave to appeal refused
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 20(2)(c)(iib) Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1), (1A) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.27
Ashby v Slipper [2016] FCAFC 63; (2016) 241 FCR 55 Australian Gas Light Co v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] FCA 1101; [2003] ATPR 41-956 Cavar v Greengate Management Services Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 961 Décor Corp Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 844; (1991) 33 FCR 397 Cases cited: Ortiz v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 427; (2015) 150 ALD 334 Qajar v Australian Human Rights Commission [2022] FCA 1339 Qajar v Australian Human Rights Commission [2022] FCA 189 Qajar v Australian Human Rights Commission [2023] FCA 314 SZVMQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 558 Tu'uta Katoa v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] HCA 28; (2022) 276 CLR 579
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate