Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Chadwick v State of New South Wales (No 5) [2024] FCA 1295 File number: NSD 1307 of 2020
Judgment of: KENNETT J
Date of judgment: 8 November 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where applicant seeks leave to file proposed further amended concise statement – where amendments seek to rely on further evidence for which leave has not been sought – where amendments seek to make collateral attacks on New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal decisions – where amendments are not material facts – where amendments have no utility – where applicant raises allegations not within the scope of the applicant's complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission – application of s 46PO of Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth)
Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) ss 46PH, 46PO Racial Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) Legislation: Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 16.43 Housing Act 2001 (NSW) s 57 Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) s 41
Cases cited: Chadwick v State of New South Wales (No 4) [2024] FCA 651 Hanson v Burston [2022] FCA 1234
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 41
Date of hearing: 19 August 2024
Counsel for the applicant: M Dulhunty
Solicitor for the applicant: Direct access brief
Counsel for the respondents: R Lee
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate