Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia The Practice Pty Ltd v The Practice Business Advisers & Tax Practitioners Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1299 File number(s):
Judgment of: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 12 November 2024
Catchwords: TRADE MARKS – infringement claim pursuant to s 120 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (the Act) – whether the respondent used the plain word mark THE PRACTICE as a trade mark – whether the respondent's marks are substantially identical with, or deceptively similar to, the applicant's mark – defence under s 122(1)(b)(i) of the Act – whether the respondent used its logo in good faith to indicate the kind, quality or intended purpose of the services it offers – defence under s 122(1)(f) or (fa) of the Act – whether the respondent would obtain registration of its logo under s 44(3)(a) or (b) of the Act — where respondent's use of its logo was not in good faith or honest due to inadequate searches – defences not made out – claim allowed – declaratory and injunctive relief granted — damages of $200,000 awarded, including $100,000 in additional damages
Legislation: Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 10, 20, 44, 44(3), 44(3)(a), 44(3)(b), 120(1), 120(2), 122, 122(1), 122(1)(b)(i), 122(1)(f), 122(1)(fa)
Caterpillar Inc v Puma SE (2021) 162 IPR 430; [2021] FCA 1014 Energy Beverages LLC v Kangaroo Mother Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 999 Firstmac Ltd v Zip Co Ltd [2023] FCA 540 Flexopack SA Plastics Industry v Flexopack Australia Pty Ltd (2016) 118 IPR 239; [2016] FCA 235 Goodman Fielder Pte Ltd v Conga Foods Pty Ltd (2020) 158 IPR 9; [2020] FCA 1808 Hasthag Burgers Pty Ltd v In-N-Out Burgers, Inc (2020) 385 ALR 514; [2020] FCAFC 235 Hemmes Trading Pty Ltd v Establishment 203 Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1100 Cases cited: Henley Constructions Pty Ltd v Henley Arch Pty Ltd (2023) 297 FCR 353 Notaras v Barcelona Pty Ltd (2019) 138 IPR 304; [2019] FCA 4 PDP Capital Pty Ltd v Grasshopper Ventures Pty Ltd (2021) 285 FCR 598 Pham Global Pty Ltd v Insight Clinical Imaging Pty Ltd (2017) 251 FCR 379 Richard Hamilton Wines Pty Ltd v Ewell Investments Pty Ltd (1997) 39 IPR 591 Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd v Allergan Australia Pty Ltd (2023) 277 CLR 186 Sensis Pty Ltd v Senses Direct Mail and Fulfillment Pty Ltd (2019) 141 IPR 463; [2019] FCA 719 Taylor v Killer Queen, LLC (No 5) (2023) 172 IPR 1; [2023] FCA 364
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate