Federal Court of Australia
Novartis AG v Pharmacor Pty Limited (No 3) [2024] FCA 1307 File number:
Judgment of: YATES J
Date of judgment: 13 November 2024
PATENTS – infringement – standard patent for a pharmaceutical composition containing certain active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) – claim construction – whether claim covers a pharmaceutical composition where the API is in the form of a complex in which the ions are associated by non-covalent bonds PATENTS – identity of the person skilled in the art – where the person skilled in the art is understood as a "team" – discussion of the characteristics of the person skilled in the art Catchwords: PATENTS – validity – lack of inventive step – availability of prior art information – whether person skilled in the art could be reasonably expected to have ascertained and regarded as relevant certain prior art publications PATENTS – validity – lack of inventive step – discussion of the reformulated "Cripps question" – whether obviousness established on the evidence PATENTS – extension of patent term – whether extension validly granted – whether rectification of the Register of Patents should be ordered PATENTS – The Last Judgment
Legislation: Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ss 7, 18, 40, 70, 138, 192
Aktiebolaget Hassle v Alphapharm Pty Limited [2002] HCA 59; 212 CLR 411 Application of Tomlinson (1966) 363 F 2d 928 Aspirating IP Limited v Vision Systems Limited [2010] FCA 1061; 88 IPR 52 AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 99; 226 FCR 324 AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 30; 257 CLR 356 Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health USA Inc v Intervet International BV [2022] FCAFC 88; 166 IPR 468 Catnic Components v Hill & Smith Ltd [1982] RPC 183 Commissioner of Patents v Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd [2022] FCAFC 39; 291 FCR 1 Crane v Price (1842) 4 Man & G 580 Dow Corning Corporation's Application [1969] RPC 544 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Peabody [1994] HCA 43; 181 CLR 359 General Tire & Rubber Co v Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co Ltd [1972] RPC 457 Generic Health Pty Ltd v Bayer Pharma Aktiengesellschaft [2014] FCAFC 73; 222 FCR 336 GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Investments (Ireland) (No 2) Ltd v Generic Partners Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 71; 264 FCR 474 Cases cited: H Lundbeck A/S v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 70; 177 FCR 151 Hanwha Solutions Corporation v REC Solar Pte Ltd [2023] FCA 1017 Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd [2005] RPC 9 Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Doric Products Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] HCA 21; 235 CLR 173 MMD Australia Pty Ltd v Camco Engineering Pty Ltd [2024] FCAFC 38 Mylan Health Pty Ltd v Sun Pharma ANZ Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 116; 279 FRC 354 Novartis AG v Pharmacor Pty Limited [2023] FCA 804 Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation v Biorex Laboratories Ltd [1970] RPC 157 Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co Ltd v Generic Health Pty Ltd (No 4) [2015] FCA 634; 113 IPR 191 Pfizer Inc v Commissioner of Patents [2005] FCA 137; 141 FCR 413 Pharmacia LLC v Juno Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 92; 165 IPR 200 Sandoz AG v Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH [2023] FCA 1321 Sandoz AG v Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH [2024] FCAFC 135 Sequenom Inc v Ariosa Diagnostics Inc [2019] FCA 1011 143 IPR 24 Sunbeam Corporation v Morphy-Richards (Aust) Pty Ltd (1961) 180 CLR 98 Wellcome Foundation Ltd v VR Laboratories (Aust) Pty Ltd (1981) 148 CLR 262
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate