Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia JLW24 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 1319 File number(s): NSD 1573 of 2024 NSD 1574 of 2024
Judgment of: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 15 November 2024
Catchwords: MIGRATION – judicial review application of adverse security assessment made by the Director-General of Security for the purposes of a decision by the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs to cancel the applicant's visa under s 128 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – content of the Director-General's duty to afford the applicant procedural fairness – where applicant had been located in Gaza – where the applicant was not afforded an opportunity to be heard on the adverse security assessment – consequences of public interest immunity for the principle in Blatch v Archer and evidential onus – whether the Director-General had a duty to invite the applicant for an interview in the Australian Embassy in Cairo or in Australia
Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 33 Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 (Cth) ss 4, 17(1)(c), 35, 36(1)(b), 37(1), 38, 54 Legislation: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) pt IAC Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 136 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 116(1)(g), 116(3), 127A, 128, 129(1), 131, 134B, 134C Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) regs 2.43(1)(b), 2.48
Assistant Commissioner Condon v Pompano Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 7; (2013) 252 CLR 38 Blatch v Archer (1774) 98 ER 969; (1774) 1 Cowp 63 Church of Scientology Inc v Woodward [1982] HCA 78; (1982) 154 CLR 25 CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 1; (2015) 255 CLR 514 Director-General of Security v Plaintiff S111A/2018 [2023] FCAFC 33; [2023] 296 FCR 639 El Ossman v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 636; (2017) 248 FCR 491 Gypsy Jokers Motorcycle Club Inc v Commissioner of Police [2008] HCA 4; (2008) 234 CLR 532 Ho v Powell [2001] NSWCA 168; (2001) 51 NSWLR 572 HT v The Queen [2019] HCA 40; (2019) 269 CLR 403 Imad v Director-General of Security [2024] FCA 1115 Imad v Director-General of Security [2024] FCAFC 138 Jaffarie v Director General of Security [2014] FCAFC 102; (2014) 226 FCR 505 Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81; (1985) 159 CLR 550 Leghaei v Director General of Security [2005] FCA 1576 Leghaei v Director-General of Security [2007] FCAFC 37; (2007) 214 ALR 141 Cases cited: LPDT v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2024] HCA 12; 98 ALJR 610 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSSJ [2016] HCA 29; 90 ALJR 901 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH [2015] HCA 40; (2015) 256 CLR 326 Murphy v State of Victoria (No 3 [2014] VSC 624 Nguyen v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1265; (2000) 101 FCR 20 NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] HCA 37; (2023) 97 ALJR 1005 Payne v Parker [1976] 1 NSWLR 191 Plaintiff M47/2012 v Director-General of Security [2012] HCA 46; (2012) 251 CLR 1 Plaintiff S111A/2018 v Director-General of Security [2024] HCASL 67 R v Fandakis [2002] NSWCCA 5 Rogers v Home Secretary [1973] AC 388 RP Data Ltd v Western Australian Land Information Authority [2010] FCA 922; (2010) 188 FCR 378 Sagar v O'Sullivan [2011] FCA 182; (2011) 193 FCR 311 Sankey v Whitlam [1978] HCA 43; (1978) 142 CLR 1 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63; (2006) 228 CLR 152 VAAD v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 117 Young v Quin [1985] FCA 18; (1985) 4 FCR 483
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate