Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ezy-Fit Engineering Group Pty Limited v Microm Nominees Pty Limited (No 2) [2024] FCA 1367 File number: SAD 99 of 2019
Judgment of: BANKS-SMITH J
Date of judgment: 27 November 2024
Catchwords: DAMAGES - determination of inputs for purpose of assessment of lost profits APPORTIONMENT - concurrent wrongdoers - representations misleading or deceptive - same representations made by two parties - value judgement as to apportionment of blame
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 87CD Part VIA, Schedule 2 (Australian Consumer Law) ss 18, 236 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 51A
Cases cited: British Fame (Owners) v Macgregor (Owners) [1943] AC 197 Doppstadt Australia Pty Ltd v Lovick & Son Developments Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 158 Ezy-Fit Engineering Group Pty Limited v Microm Nominees Pty Limited [2024] FCA 441 Haines v Bendall (1991) 172 CLR 60 Hunt & Hunt Lawyers v Mitchell Morgan Nominees Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 10; (2013) 247 CLR 613 McBride v Christie's Australia Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1729 Podrebersek v Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd (1985) 59 ALJR 492 Reinhold v New South Wales Lotteries Corporation (No 2) [2008] NSWSC 187; (2008) 82 NSWLR 762 Stav Investments Pty Ltd v Taylor; LK Group Investments Pty Ltd v Taylor [2022] NSWSC 208 Woods v Multi-Sport Holdings Pty Ltd [2002] HCA 9; (2002) 208 CLR 460 Yates v Mobile Marine Repairs Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1463
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate