Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
CIP Group Pty Ltd v So (No 5) [2024] FCA 1373 File number: QUD 93 of 2022
Judgment of: DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 4 December 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to vary interlocutory order made following contested hearing – injunction over proceeds purportedly payable to respondents – variation sought to permit the release of funds to enable continued defence of proceedings – where there has been a material change in circumstances – value of undertaking given in support of injunction has diminished – injunction varied
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Brimaud v Honeysett Instant Print Pty Ltd (1988) 217 ALR 44 Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Lavazza Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 894 CIP Group Pty Ltd v So (No 3) [2023] FCA 518 Goulston v Sundell as executor of the estate of the late James Ralph Sundell [2024] NSWSC 12 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [1999] NSWSC 828 Marino v FM Capital Partners Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 1301 Maverick Biomaterials Pty Ltd v Abouelkheir [2021] FCA 1157 Morara Pty Ltd v Kingslane Property Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] WASC 372 P Dawson Nominees Pty Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (No 2) (2009) 255 ALR 466 Pivotel Satellite Pty Limited v Optus Mobile Pty Limited [2010] FCA 121 Re D G Brims and Sons Pty Ltd (1995) 16 ACSR 559 Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 31) [2022] FCA 271
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate