Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Boulos v M.R.V.L. Investments Pty Ltd (Settlement Approval) [2024] FCA 1377 File number(s): NSD 2168 of 2019
Judgment of: THAWLEY J
Date of judgment: 29 November 2024
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – settlement approval – whether the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable in the interest of group members and as between them – settlement approved REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – deductions for funding commission and expenses, legal costs and scheme administration costs – whether proposed deductions should be made – where lawyer's costs agreement relevant to pre-funded period is void – need for transparency and assistance in claims for legal costs in class actions – lower amount for costs fixed than those claimed – whether funding commission is "just" – lower commission allowed – anticipated costs for administration of settlement distribution scheme allowed
Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 570 Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 33V, 33ZB Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) Legal Profession Act 2006 (ACT) ss 269, 279, 284
Asirifi-Otchere v Swann Insurance (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2020] FCA 1885; 385 ALR 625 Augusta Ventures Limited v Mt Arthur Coal Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 194; 384 ALR 340 Blairgowrie Trading Ltd v Allco Finance Group Ltd (Receivers & Managers Appointed) (in liq) (No 3) [2017] FCA 330; 343 ALR 476 BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster [2019] HCA 45; 269 CLR 574 Boulos v MRVL Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 309 Bradshaw v BSA Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 1440 Camilleri v The Trust Company (Nominees) Ltd [2015] FCA 1468 Davaria Pty Ltd v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 183; 281 FCR 501 Duck v Airservices Australia (No 3) [2021] FCA 304 Earglow Pty Ltd v Newcrest Mining Limited [2016] FCA 1433 Elliott-Carde v McDonald's Australia Limited [2023] FCAFC 162; 301 FCR 1 Cases cited: Fowkes v Boston Scientific Corporation [2023] FCA 230 Galactic Seven Eleven Litigation Holdings LLC v Davaria [2024] FCAFC 54; 302 FCR 493 Hall v Arnold Bloch Leibler (No 2) [2022] FCA 163 Haselhurst v Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1076 Kelly v Willmott Forests Ltd (in liq) (No 4) [2016] FCA 323; 335 ALR 439 Mitic v Oz Minerals Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 409 Money Max Int Pty Ltd (Trustee) v QBE Insurance Ltd [2016] FCAFC 148; 245 FCR 191 Petersen Superannuation Fund Pty Ltd v Bank of Queensland Ltd (No 3) [2018] FCA 1842; 132 ACSR 258 Schoneweiss v Fourth Force Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 1489 Thomas v Romeo Lockleys Asset Partnership (No 2) [2022] FCA 1276 Thomas v Romeo Lockleys Asset Partnership [2022] FCA 1106 Uren v RMBL Investments Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 647 Watson & Co Superannuation Pty Ltd v Dixon Advisory and Superannuation Services Ltd (Settlement Approval) [2024] FCA 386
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate