Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Azimitabar v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2024] FCA 1383 File number(s):
Judgment of: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 2 December 2024
Catchwords: COSTS —where applicant unsuccessful in proceeding and seeks no order as to costs in the proceeding — whether appropriate to depart from usual order as to costs — proceeding brought in the public interest — appropriate to make no order as to costs.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 273
Animals Angels' eV v Secretary, Department of Agriculture [2014] FCAFC 173; 228 FCR 35 Azimitabar v Commonwealth of Australia [2024] FCAFC 52; 303 FCR 282 Caroona Coal Action Group Inc v Coal Mines Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2010] NSWLEC 59; 173 LGERA 280 Commonwealth v AJL20 [2021] HCA 21; 273 CLR 43 CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 1; 255 CLR 514 DBE17 v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2018] FCA 1793 Cases cited: Jacob v Save Beeliar Wetlands (Inc) [2016] WASCA 126; 216 LGERA 201 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CQZ15 (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 19; 259 FCR 569 Norbis v Norbis [1986] HCA 17; 161 CLR 513 Northern Territory v Sangare [2019] HCA 25; 265 CLR 164 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; 193 CLR 72 Plaintiff M96A/2016 v Commonwealth [2017] HCA 16; 261 CLR 582 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) [2001] FCA 1865; 115 FCR 229 The Wilderness Society Inc v The Hon Malcolm Turnbull, Minister for the Environment and Water Resources [2007] FCA 1863
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate