Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
UFC Enterprise Morley Pty Ltd v UFC Enterprise Northbridge Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1396 File number: WAD 357 of 2024
Judgment of: FEUTRILL J
Date of judgment: 29 November 2024
Date of publication of reasons: 4 December 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – urgent ex parte application for freezing orders under r 7.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – application before start of proceeding under r 7.01 – consideration of applicable principles – good arguable case for breaches of statutory and fiduciary duties and equitable compensation – danger of frustrating prospective judgment – asset preservation orders
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 181, 182, 1317H , 1324(1), 1324(4) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 7.01, 7.32
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [2006] HCA 46; 227 CLR 57 Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd [1968] HCA 1; 118 CLR 618 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Hua Wang Bank Berhad [2010] FCA 1014; 273 ALR 194 Duro Felguera Australia Pty Ltd v Trans Global Projects Pty Ltd (in liq) [2018] WASCA 174; 53 WAR 201 Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd [1987] HCA 23; 162 CLR 612 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2011] FCAFC 156; 217 FCR 238 Severstal Export GmbH v Bhushan Steel Ltd [2013] NSWCA 102; 84 NSWLR 141
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate