Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
CIP Group Pty Ltd v So (No 7) [2024] FCA 1437 File number(s): QUD 93 of 2022
Judgment of: COLLIER ACJ
Date of judgment: 12 December 2024
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – legal professional privilege – receiver as client – whether sufficient basis to maintain claim for legal professional privilege over bills of costs – claim upheld
Cases cited: Carey v Korda [2012] WASCA 228
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 16
Date of last submission/s: 1 October 2024
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicants and the Second to Thirteenth Respondents: Mr B Walker with Mr A Psaltis and Ms D Tay
Solicitor for the Applicants and the Second to Thirteenth Respondents: Bartley Cohen
Counsel for the First and Fourteenth to Twentieth Respondents: Mr D O'Brien with Mr D Marckwald
Solicitor for the First and Fourteenth to Twentieth Respondents: Colin Biggers & Paisley
Counsel for the Twenty-Second and Twenty-Third Respondents: Mr T Pincus
Solicitor for the Twenty-Second and Twenty-Third Respondents: Hall & Wilcox
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate