Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Edwards v Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd a trustee of the Retail Employees Superannuation Trust (No 2) [2024] FCA 1446 File number:
Judgment of: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 16 December 2024
Catchwords: COSTS – whether third and fourth respondents were necessary parties to the proceedings – whether third and fourth respondents were in a position analogous to interveners so that costs should not ordinarily follow the event – whether the applicant should pay costs on an indemnity basis
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 1054, 1056A, 1057 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43
Clifton v Kerry J Investment Pty Ltd (No 2) (2020) 277 FCR 382 Comcare v Martinez [2013] FCA 160 Edwards v Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd a trustee of the Retail Employees Superannuation Trust [2024] FCA 1091 Cases cited: Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 Melbourne City Investments Pty Ltd v Treasury Wines Estates Limited (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 116 Northern Territory v Sangare (2019) 265 CLR 164 R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex Parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13
Division: General Division
Registry: South Australia
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate