Federal Court of Australia
Wood v Buckingham [2024] FCA 1447 Review of:
File number:
Judgment of: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 17 December 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for judicial review of a Registrar's decision under r 2.26 of the Federal Catchwords: Court Rules 2011 (Cth) to reject documents for filing – whether the original application and accompanying documents are frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of process – application dismissed
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5 Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 19(1) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.26 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1A)(c)
Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd (2001) 204 CLR 559 Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1987) 18 FCR 212 Ferdinands v Cridland [2022] FCAFC 80 Cases cited: Ferdinands v Registrar Cridland [2021] FCA 592 Nyoni v Murphy (2018) 261 FCR 146 Northern Territory v GPAO (1999) 196 CLR 553 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 275 CLR 582 Rana v Google Inc (2017) 254 FCR 1
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area:
Number of paragraphs: 25
Date of hearing: 10 December 2024
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate