Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Commissioner of Taxation v Bakarich (No 2) [2024] FCA 1448 File number: NSD 217 of 2020
Judgment of: KENNETT J
Date of judgment: 16 December 2024
Catchwords: TAXATION – where first and fourth respondents admit contraventions of s 290-50(1) of Sch 1 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) – whether agreed civil penalties for first and fourth respondents appropriate having regard to all relevant matters pursuant to s 290-50(5) – where second and third respondents are defunct corporate entities that have not taken an active role in the proceeding – whether second and third respondents contravened s 290-50(1) – whether proposed penalty for second and third respondents appropriate – whether declarations of contraventions should be made in respect of each respondent
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 500(2) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 4AA Crimes Legislation Amendment (Penalty Unit) Act 2015 (Cth) Sch 1 Item 5 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 191 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) Div 355 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Sch 1 ss 290-5, 290-50, s 290-55, 290-60, 290-65, 290-200
Cases cited: Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 113; 254 FCR 68 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pattinson [2022] HCA 13; 274 CLR 450 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Geowash Pty Ltd (subject to a deed of co arrangement) (No 4) [2020] FCA 23; (2020) 376 ALR 701 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Get Qualified Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2017] FCA 1018 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Leahy Petroleum Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] FCA 254; 215 ALR 281 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Leahy Petroleum Pty Ltd (No 3) [2005] FCA 265; 215 ALR 301 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Master Wealth Control Pty Ltd (Penalty) [2024] FCA 795 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 56; 201 FCR 378 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; 340 ALR 25 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Axis International Management Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 852; 178 FCR 485 Commissioner of Taxation v Arnold (No 2) [2015] FCA 34; 324 ALR 59 Commissioner of Taxation v Bakarich (Penalty) [2022] FCA 1032 Commissioner of Taxation v Bogiatto (No 2) [2021] FCA 98 Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; 258 CLR 482 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v International Indigenous Football Foundation Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 528; 107 ATR 769 Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 72; ATPR 41-993 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 Rural Press Ltd v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [2003] HCA 75; 216 CLR 53 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20; 287 ALR 249 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd [1991] ATPR 41-076 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2021] FCAFC 49; 284 FCR 24
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate