Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union v AMK Images Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2024] FCA 1457 Appeal from: Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union v AMK Imaging Pty Ltd [2024] FedCFamC2G 361
File number(s):
Judgment of: GOODMAN J
Date of judgment: 18 December 2024
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – appeal from orders made by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) imposing penalties for contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – whether appeal incompetent by reason of an agreement reached between the parties before the primary judge concerning submissions to be made, or by reason of an estoppel – held appeal competent INDUSTRIAL LAW – civil penalties – multiple contraventions of a civil penalty provision – whether penalties imposed were manifestly inadequate – orders of the primary judge set aside
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss 45, 323, 536, 545, 546, 550, 557 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 4, 24
Airservices Australia v Civil Air Operations Officers' Association of Australia [2022] FCAFC 172; (2022) 295 FCR 36 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Australian Workers' Union [2022] FCAFC 143; (2022) 406 ALR 20 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 113; (2017) 254 FCR 68 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pattinson [2022] HCA 13; (2022) 274 CLR 450 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Employsure Pty Ltd [2023] FCAFC 5; (2023) 407 ALR 302 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Wooldridge [2019] FCAFC 172 Australian Ophthalmic Supplies Pty Ltd v McAlary-Smith [2008] FCAFC 8; (2008) 165 FCR 560 Boensch v Pascoe [2019] HCA 49; (2019) 268 CLR 593 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Registered Organisations Commissioner [2020] FCAFC 232; (2020) 283 FCR 404 Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union v AMK Images Pty Ltd (in liq) [2024] FCA 1057 Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union v AMK Imaging Pty Ltd [2024] FedCFam C2G 361 Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Fair Work Ombudsman [2023] FCAFC 161; (2023) 299 FCR 334 Cases cited: Davey v Herbst (No 2) [2012] ACTCA 19 Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FCA 413 Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (Kiama Aged Care Centre Case) (No 3) [2023] FCA 1324 Fair Work Ombudsman v Ho [2024] FCAFC 111 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 McKinnon v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2006] FCAFC 10 Rocky Holdings Pty Ltd v Fair Work Ombudsman [2014] FCAFC 62; (2014) 221 FCR 153 Singh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1725 Singh v Owners Strata Plan No 11723 (No 3) [2012] FCA 1121; (2012) 207 FCR 390 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd [1982] HCA 24; (1982) 149 CLR 337 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd [1990] FCA 762; (1991) ATPR ¶41-076 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584 Zegarac v Dellios [2007] FCAFC 58
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate