Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Farrell v Super Retail Group Limited (Adjournment Application) [2024] FCA 1473 File number: NSD 1009 of 2024
Judgment of: LEE J
Date of judgment: 12 December 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to adjourn the hearing – where senior counsel seeks to withdraw from hearing of applicant's specific performance claim – appropriate exercise of the discretion – application refused
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Pt 3.10, Div 1 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Pt VB
Cases cited: Farrell v Super Retail Group Limited (Cross-claim) [2024] FCA 1189
Division: Fair Work
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 17
Date of hearing: 12 December 2024
Counsel for the applicant: Mr S Prince SC with Mr P Moorhouse and Ms T Wong
Solicitors for the applicant: Harmers Workplace Lawyers
Counsel for the first, second, third and fifth respondents: Mr J Sheahan KC with Mr M Follett SC, Ms Z Hillman and Mr D Ward
Solicitors for the first, second, third and fifth respondents: Allens
Counsel for the fourth respondent: Ms S Palaniappan
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate