Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Tham v Australian Capital Territory [2024] FCA 1508 File number:
Judgment of: SNADEN J
Date of judgment: 18 December 2024
Date of publication of reasons: 20 December 2024
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING – settlement approval application under s 33V of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable in the interests of group members – whether orders under pt VAA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) are necessary in respect of certain evidence – settlement approved.
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 50 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 33V
Bradshaw v BSA Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 1440 Cases cited: Caason Investments Pty Ltd v Cao (No 2) [2018] FCA 527 Ewok Pty Ltd v Wellard Ltd [2024] FCA 296 Pearson v State of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 619
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area:
Number of paragraphs: 30
Date of hearing: 18 December 2024
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms M Szydzik SC with Mr D Murphy
Solicitor for the Applicant: Gordon Legal
Counsel for the First Respondent: Ms H A Tiplady
Solicitor for the First Respondent: ACT Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr J Entwisle
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: MinterEllison
ORDERS VID 705 of 2022
BETWEEN: YING YING THAM Applicant AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY AND: First Respondent CALVARY HEALTH CARE ACT LIMITED (ACN 105 304 989) Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate