Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Horsky v Mesoblast Limited [2024] FCA 1509 File number: VID 268 of 2022
Judgment of: BEACH J
Date of judgment: 13 December 2024
Date of publication of reasons: 20 December 2024
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS — securities class action — settlement of the consolidated proceeding — approval of settlement under s 33V(1) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) — distribution orders under s 33V(2)
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Part IVA, ss 33V, 33V(2)
Cases cited: Money Max Int Pty Ltd v QBE Insurance Group Ltd (2016) 245 FCR 191 Parkin v Boral Ltd (2022) 291 FCR 116 Wetdal Pty Ltd as Trustee for the BlueCo Two Superannuation Fund v Estia Health Limited [2021] FCA 475
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 68
Date of hearing: 13 December 2024
Counsel for the Joint Applicants: Mr W A D Edwards KC and Mr R Davies
Solicitors for the Joint Applicants: Phi Finney McDonald and William Roberts Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr K A Loxley
Solicitor for the Respondent: Minter Ellison
ORDERS VID 268 of 2022
BETWEEN: PAUL TIBOR HORSKY First Applicant
OIL SURVEILLANCE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 092 979 Second Applicant
AND: MESOBLAST LIMITED (ACN 109 431 870) Respondent
order made by: BEACH J DATE OF ORDER: 13 DECEMBER 2024
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate