Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Chu v Lin, in the matter of Gold Stone Capital Pty Ltd (No 8) [2024] FCA 1520 File number(s): NSD 32 of 2022
Judgment of: GOODMAN J
Date of judgment: 23 December 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for an expansion of an existing freezing order so as to prevent building work being undertaken on the subject property – no issue as to the existence of an arguable case or the adequacy of the undertaking proffered – balance of convenience favours the expansion of the existing order
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 121
Cases cited: Chu v Lin, in the matter of Gold Stone Capital Pty Ltd (Trial Judgment) [2024] FCA 766 Chu v Lin, in the matter of Gold Stone Capital Pty Ltd (No 4) [2024] FCA 980 Chu v Lin, in the matter of Gold Stone Capital Pty Ltd (No 7) [2024] FCA 1417
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 18
Date of hearing: 20 December 2024
Counsel for the Plaintiffs/Applicants: Mr R Scruby SC with Mr D Meyerowitz-Katz
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs/Applicants: McCabes
Counsel for the Fifth and Sixth Respondents: Mr S J Burchett
Solicitor for the Fifth and Sixth Respondents: Coleman Greig Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 32 of 2022 IN THE MATTER OF GOLD STONE CAPITAL PTY LTD BETWEEN: HONG CHU First Plaintiff and First Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate