Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Fine China Capital Investment Limited, in the matter of Fine China Capital Investment Limited [2024] FCA 1523 File number(s):
Judgment of: NESKOVCIN J
Date of judgment: 24 December 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for leave to join a second respondent pursuant to r 9.05 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – leave granted – application for security for costs pursuant to s 56 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and s1335 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – foreign corporation – application granted
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1335 Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 56 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 9.05
Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 Commissioner of Taxation v Vasiliades [2016] FCAFC 170; 344 ALR 558 Concrete Mining Structures Pty Ltd v Cellcrete Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 360 Derma Pen LLC v Biosoft (Australia) Pty Ltd (Security for Costs) [2022] FCA 885 Energy Drilling Inc v Petroz NL [1989] ATPR 40-954 Cases cited: Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89; [2007] HCA 22 Farmitalia Carlo Erba SrL v Delta West Pty Ltd (1994) 28 IPR 336 Fine China Capital Investment Limited v Qi (No 4) [2024] FCA 343 Madgwick v Kelly [2013] FCAFC 61; 212 FCR 1 Maxim's Caterers Limited v Magnona Pty Ltd (No 1) [2010] FCA 450 Yara Australia Pty Ltd v Oswal (2013) 41 VR 245; [2013] VSCA 156
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate