Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Saffari v Latitude Financial Services Australia Holdings Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 6 Appeal from:
File number:
Judgment of: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 17 January 2025
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time and leave to appeal – where primary judge dismissed proceeding under r 5.23(1)(b) of Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), whether leave to appeal required – where applicant applied for leave to add three respondents and leave refused, whether open to applicant to apply for leave to appeal from that decision – whether merit in any of proposed grounds of appeal
Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 13 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 191(2) Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24(1)(a), 24(1A), 24(1AA), 24(1E), 31A, 37M, 59(4) Legislation Act 2003 (Cth) s 13(1) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.40, 2.21, 2.25, 2.27, 5.22, 5.23(1)(b), 8.05, 35.11, 35.13
Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Phillip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170 Anying Group Pty Ltd v Wang [2012] FCA 702 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v RI Advice Group Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 496; 160 ASCR 204 Avetmiss Easy Pty Ltd v Australian Skills Qualifications Authority [2014] FCA 507 Bienstein v Bienstein (2003) 195 ALR 225 Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61288 (2014) 254 CLR 185 Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd (No 1) (1981) 147 CLR 246 Dauget v Centrelink [2015] FCA 1212 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited (No 2) [2010] FCA 817 E Pty Ltd & Anor v Zunino [2020] FamCAFC 216 Gill v iiNet Limited [2016] FCA 1273 Cases cited: In re the Will of FB Gilbert (dec.) (1946) 46 SR(NSW) 318 Jefferson Ford Pty Ltd v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (2008) 167 FCR 372 Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 564 Melbourne City Investments Pty Ltd v Treasury Wine Estates Ltd [2019] FCA 1458 Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 274 Nasir v Reynolds (Application for leave to appeal) [2024] FCA 865 O'Keefe v Hayes Knight GTO Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1559 Plaintiff S164/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] HCA 51; 361 ALR 8; 92 ALJR 1039 Rawson Finances Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCAFC 139; 81 ATR 36 Re Luck [2003] HCA 70; 203 ALR 1; 78 ALJR 177 Revill v John Holland Group Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1633 Revill v John Holland Group Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 558 Smith, in the matter of Peko Rehabilitation Project Pty Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed) (in liq) [2011] FCA 1448 Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia (2010) 241 CLR 118
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate