Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Commissioner of the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission v Valmar Support Services Ltd [2025] FCA 11 File number(s):
Judgment of: RAPER J
Date of judgment: 22 January 2025
Catchwords: CIVIL PENALTY – proceeding for civil penalty contraventions of ss 73J and 73V of the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth) – where failures involved breaches of the National Disability Insurance Scheme Practice Guidelines and the NDIS Code of Conduct – where conduct is serious – where failures placed NDIS participants at a real and significant risk for which the consequences were fatal for one participant – whether there were mitigating factors present – whether it is appropriate for the Court to make declarations of contraventions and to impose civil penalties sought – the contraventions of ss 73J and 73V made out – the Court was satisfied that the declarations and pecuniary penalty sought were appropriate having regard to all relevant matters.
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 191 National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth) ss 3, 4, 73F, 74F(2)(c), 73J, 73V, 73ZK, 181C–H Legislation: Regulatory Powers (Standard Provisions) Act 2014 (Cth) ss 4, 82, 82(3), 82(6), 82(6)(a)–(c), 82(6)(d), 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 National Disability Insurance Scheme (Code of Conduct) Rules 2018 (Cth) s 6(1)(c) National Disability Insurance Scheme (Provider Registration and Practice Standards) Rules 2018 (Cth) cl 10 Sch 1 Pt 3, cl 12 of Sch 1 Pt 3, cl 15 of Sch 1 Pt 3, cl 21 of Sch 1 Pt 4
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pattinson [2022] HCA 13; 274 CLR 450 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2016] FCA 1526 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 159; 258 FCR 312 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 330; 327 ALR 540 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hillside (Australia New Media) Pty Ltd t/a Bet365 (No 2) [2016] FCA 698 Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; 340 ALR 25 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73; 262 FCR 243 Commissioner of Taxation v Balasubramaniyan [2022] FCA 374 Commissioner of the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission (Cth) v LiveBetter Services Ltd [2024] FCA 374 Commissioner of the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission v Australian Foundation for Disability [2023] FCA 629 Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; 258 CLR 482 Fair Work Ombudsman v 85 Degrees Coffee Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1317
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate