Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Kant v Australian Information Commissioner [2025] FCA 16 File number(s): VID 528 of 2024
Judgment of: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 23 January 2025
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — application for leave to appeal from interlocutory judgment pursuant to s 24(1A) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) — leave to appeal refused
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24(1A), 35A, 37AG(1)(a), 37AI Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) ss 39B, 78B Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) s 80W, sch 1 Regulatory Powers (Standard Provisions) Act 2014 (Cth) ss 121, 124 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 35.12(2)(d)
Cases cited: Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 GPV18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 393 Kant v Australian Information Commissioner [2024] FCA 599
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 46
Date of last submission/s: 5 September 2024
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: K McInnes
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS VID 528 of 2024
BETWEEN: JAN MAREK KANT Applicant
AND: THE AUSTRALIAN INFORMATION COMMISSIONER Respondent
order made by: O'CALLAGHAN J DATE OF ORDER: 23 January 2025
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate