Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Callide Energy Pty Ltd v Park [2025] FCA 37 File number:
Judgment of: SHARIFF J
Date of judgment: 3 February 2025
Catchwords: CONTRACTS – contractual construction and interpretation – joint venture agreement – pre-emptive rights clauses – where a pre-emptive right is exercisable upon a change in control – privity of contract – agency – where a clause purports to impose obligations on a non-party company in a corporate group – whether a subsidiary is obliged to use reasonable endeavours to procure its parent companies to perform contractual obligations – where a joint venture participant ceases to be a subsidiary of its ultimate holding company – whether a defined term must yield to the wider context of the agreement – whether a defined term results in absurdity or inconsistency – "woodenly literal" approach COURTS AND JUDGES – judicial comity – whether Court bound to follow earlier decision involving construction of same contractual provisions unless persuaded earlier decision "plainly wrong" – where earlier decision involved making of judicial directions under s 90-15 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations)
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Sch 2 (Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations)), s 90-15 Legislation: Corporations Act 1989 (Cth) Part 13 (Corporations Law), s 82 (repealed) Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) r 2.13
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate