Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Koninklijke Douwe Egberts BV v Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd (Costs) [2025] FCA 38 File number:
Judgment of: WHEELAHAN J
Date of judgment: 31 January 2025
Catchwords: COSTS — where the applicants brought a claim of trade mark infringement against the respondent – where the respondent brought a cross-claim seeking the cancellation of the first applicant's registered trade mark – where both the applicants' claim and the respondent's cross-claim failed – where the cross-claim was only ever defensive – whether the respondent should have its costs of the unsuccessful cross-claim – held: the applicants should pay the respondent's costs of the claim and the cross-claim on a party and party basis having regard to the fact that the whole proceeding was properly viewed as one event – the costs incurred by the respondent in pursuing its cross-claim were incurred as part of a proportional, reasonable, and integrated response to the applicants' unsuccessful claim. COSTS — Calderbank offer – where the respondent made a Calderbank offer before trial – where the offer invited the applicants to discontinue the proceeding and pay 60% of the respondent's actually incurred costs, in exchange for the respondent discontinuing the cross-claim – held: it was not unreasonable for the applicants not to accept the Calderbank offer – the Calderbank offer hardly constituted a compromise, having regard to its terms, and the defensive nature of the cross-claim – application for indemnity costs refused.
Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Ltd v ACPA Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 112 Damorgold Pty Ltd v Blindware Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 364 Davies v Lazer Safe Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCAFC 118 DSI Australia (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Garford Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 268 GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Investments (Ireland) (No 2) Ltd v Generic Partners Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 100 Global Brand Marketing Inc v YD Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 605; 76 IPR 161 H Lundbeck A/S v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] FCAFC 118 Hansen Beverage Co v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCA 601 Cases cited: JMVB Enterprises Pty Ltd v Camoflag Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] FCAFC 6 Koninklijke Douwe Egberts BV v Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1277 New South Wales Dairy Corp v Murray Goulburn Co-operative Co Ltd (1989) 14 IPR 75 Northern Territory v Sangare [2019] HCA 25; 265 CLR 164 PAC Mining Pty Ltd v Esco Corp (No 2) [2009] FCAFC 52 Plaintiff M76/2013 v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship [2013] HCA 53; 251 CLR 322 Swancom Pty Ltd v The Jazz Corner Hotel Pty Ltd (No 3) [2021] FCA 729 Tramanco Pty Ltd v BPW Transpec Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCAFC 58 Calderbank v Calderbank [1976] Fam 93
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate