Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Drury on behalf of the Nanda People v State of Western Australia [2025] FCA 55 File number(s): WAD 30 of 2019 WAD 176 of 2019
Judgment of: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 13 February 2025
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – consent determination – nomination of prescribed body corporate
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 56, 61, 66, 87, 87A, 94A, 225
Cases cited: Agius v South Australia (No 6) [2018] FCA 358 Attorney-General (NT) v Ward [2003] FCAFC 283; 134 FCR 16 Austin on behalf of the Eastern Maar People v State of Victoria [2023] FCA 237 Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria (No 5) [2011] FCA 932 McKellar on behalf of the Wongkumara People v State of Queensland [2024] FCA 699 Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria [2002] HCA 58; 214 CLR 422 Papertalk on behalf of the Mullewa Wadjari People v State of Western Australia [2022] FCA 221 Papertalk on behalf of the Mullewa Wadjari People v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2024] FCA 1132 Violet Drury v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2019] FCA 1812 Violet Drury v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 1849
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Native Title
Number of paragraphs: 54
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate